Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> (11/12/2009): >> I'm Cc-ing -java@, they might tweak some package relationships to >> help package managers figure out a solution. > > I would prefer to see gjdoc being removed for the release, if > possible. for the packages build-depending it for now, just remove > it from the b-d's and make sure that javadoc is used instead of > gjdoc. If for some reason, you need it explicitely, maybe b-d on > gcj-jdk | gjdoc. The list of packages are: > > aspectj babel jaminid jesd jmdns libcsv-java libjibx-java mina > trilead-ssh2 weirdx > > I'll care about gcj-4.3, and classpath should use the just built > gjdoc like the gcj-4.4 build does. Alright, thanks. I'll point people to your mail if I notice other related FTBFS in the future. Mraw, KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature