[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: munin-java-plugins package - request for review

> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> wrote:
>> I did not mean to suggest that you should remove your current java
>> alternatives (default-jre-headless | java2-runtime-headless)[1]; only
>> that you extended it to include java5 and java6 as well. Particularly
>> all of the javaX-runtime-headless packages are virtual, so you should
>> keep default-jre-headless (which is not virtual).
>> ~Niels
>> [1] You should of course remove java2-runtime-headless, if the plug-ins
>> cannot run with java2 specification.

Ah, sorry, I must have misunderstood this point in the previous email initial
email, my bad. I've checked in a correction.

Thanks for the pointers :D

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to: