Re: Any plan to update java3d
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Jonny Lamb<jonny@debian.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 16:53:10 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> 1. Why are we trying to build CVS version instead of latest stable version?
>
> That's what Petter did initially, and I didn't look at what was
> available upstream.
>
>> 2. The version number in the changelog says dfsg, but there is no
>> readme file justifying the dfsg string in version. I looked at
>> upstream source and didn't see any non-DFSG Free files in package.
>
> The changes are mentioned in the changelog. I guess I should have put
> the changes in README.source.
Are you referring to following entry in changelog?
* debian/rules: Remove unzipsfx executables from orig.tar.gz.
As I said, current upstream (1.5.2) source zip does not contain any
non-DFSG-Free files. It does not contain any class or jar files
either.
>> 3. How about changing the source package name to match the upstream
>> tarball name?
>
> You mean j3d?
Yes, But this is not strict requirement as of now.
Regards,
Onkar
Reply to: