Re: Any plan to update java3d
On Fri, Jun 26, 16:53:10 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> 1. Why are we trying to build CVS version instead of latest stable version?
That's what Petter did initially, and I didn't look at what was
available upstream.
> 2. The version number in the changelog says dfsg, but there is no
> readme file justifying the dfsg string in version. I looked at
> upstream source and didn't see any non-DFSG Free files in package.
The changes are mentioned in the changelog. I guess I should have put
the changes in README.source.
> 3. How about changing the source package name to match the upstream
> tarball name?
You mean j3d?
--
Jonny Lamb, UK
jonny@debian.org
Reply to: