On Sat Mar 28 13:56, Dominik Smatana wrote: > On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Matthew Johnson <mjj29@debian.org> wrote: >> One small point for next time you change it, debian/copyright doesn't >> actually give the licence of the packaging. It's been like that for a >> while though, so I'm uploading anyway. It would be good to change >> though. > > ok, I'll fix it, just.. I'm not quite sure what do you mean by "license of packaging"? > > btw: Can I use new proposal (http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat) for debian/copyright already? Or should I still use the "old style"? That proposal is not finalized yet, I think general package adoption should wait until it is. That said, there isn't a current 'format' per-se, just a set of information which needs to be provided. If you can do that in the context of a more structured format, that's also cool. Matt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature