Re: RFC: docbook-xsl-saxon (Java extensions for use with DocBook XML stylesheets (Saxon))
Am Samstag, den 06.10.2007, 22:40 +0200 schrieb Michael Koch:
> Sorry for the late answer.
No problem. I'm happy, that I *got* an answer :)
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 02:12:56AM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
[lintian and build-depends/build-depends-indep]
> We put ant and the runtime into
> Build-Depends-Indep and live with a broken clean target. As the clean
> target normally only deletes stuff you can simply do some rm calls in it
> and done use ant/runtime.
>
> > The package builds fine with kaffe and gcj-java-compat-dev. BTW: Do both
> > use ecj to compile the source? If yes, where is the difference, if I use
> > gcj-java-compat-dev or kaffe as build-dependency? I'm sorry for the
> > questions, but this is my first Java package and I'm trying to learn
> > more about Java packaging for Debian.
>
> Both use ecj. They generally produce the same output. Some time ago we
> decided to make java-gcj-compat the default runtime to use in Debian and
> Ubuntu. It supports most archs and is/was the default runtime in Ubuntu.
> This had the advantage that we have very few differences between Debian
> and Ubuntu and can merge fixes between the both very easily.
Thanks for your explanations. The package is now waiting to be uploaded
by my sponsor. I hope, it will hit Debian soon. The test-case is
properly processed, so the package seems to work properly.
> I hope my answers help a bit.
Yes, thanks. So I can begin packaging the extensions for Xalan too.
Regards, Daniel
Reply to: