Re: Bug#448286: java-common: [POLICY-PROPOSAL] Almost all Java libraries should be in section libs.
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 11:05:43PM +0100, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> Hello Matthias, Michael,
> may I express the opinion that you might not have read exactly what I've
> written? (gosh, I'm so polite :-) )
> My list contained all the software *depending* on at least one package
> containing java in its name. As, according to the Java policy, all packages
> _must_ depend on either java-common, javaX-runtime or java-virtual-machine,
> my list should have all Java packages.
> For example, bsh, checkstyle and junit are all in my list...
> Or did I just miss your point?
Sorry, I think putting the list into an attachment that is gzipped
doesnt made the list very visible.