Re: ITP: openjdk-hotspot-jvm -- Hotspot JVM from Sun
Ola Lundqvist writes:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 11:22:37PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Ola Lundqvist writes:
> > > -rw-r--r-- root/root 77508 2006-11-16 20:38 ./usr/include/jvmti.h
> > > -rw-r--r-- root/root 68996 2006-11-16 20:38 ./usr/include/jni.h
> > > drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-11-16 20:38 ./usr/include/linux/
> > > -rw-r--r-- root/root 1780 2006-11-16 20:38 ./usr/include/linux/jni_md.h
> > > -rw-r--r-- root/root 13258 2006-11-16 20:38 ./usr/include/jmm.h
> >
> > that is definitely wrong. please move these to a private area.
>
> Ok, if they are private, should they be included at all?
yes, every jdk provides them. you usually want them installed, but in
a directory where these can be access by a specific include only.
> > > drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-11-16 20:38 ./usr/lib/openjdk-hotspot-jvm/
> >
> > why -jvm? is there a separate dir for -jdk?
>
> Because the package name is -jvm. It has no jdk functionality as it is not
> released yet.
maybe. but different directories for jvm and jdk are a bad
idea. please have a look at the java-gcj-compat and sun-java5
packages. both jre and jdk should install into a common directory.
> > please provide the jvm in /usr/lib/jvm, as we currently do for the
> > majority of packaged runtimes.
>
> Oh such a directory exist. I'll move it there. I'll check the other jvms
> to see how they handle the structure.
that would be nice. I had a chat with Tom Marble how to better handle
the set of alternatives forming a runtime or a jdk, but none of us did
write down a proposal yet.
Matthias
Reply to: