Re: java-gcj-compat : a missing link?
Yes, I read thread and I agree with that.
But I also need a working Eclipse and it should be 3.0 because of
plugins compatibility.
I am just doing it by/for myself (with help of other's work of
course).
And I see that in RedHat (Fedora) use /usr/share/java-ext, I do not
have a Fedora and I do not know what go there, I also see an annoying
error message related to charsets class in eclipse that could go out
with the help of some jars when starting Eclipse.
That's all, I do not want to waste people's time.
Daniele.
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 01:34:39PM -0500, Barry Hawkins wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Daniele Cruciani wrote:
> | I miss that new upstream java-gcj-compat package in javac use this:
> |
> | exec /usr/bin/gij-4.0 \
> | -Dgnu.gcj.precompiled.db.path=/usr/lib/eclipse/plugins.db \
> | -Djava.ext.dirs=/usr/lib/java-ext:/usr/share/java-ext \
> | com.sun.tools.javac.Main ${1+"$@"}
> |
> | with s/plugins.db/eclipse.db/ that i think how RedHat call db for so
> |
> | what is /usr/lib/java-ext and /usr/share/java-ext ? ok /usr/share/java ?
> |
> | And also is not better to have db in, say /usr/lib/java/gcj-bcabi.db ?
> | there is a limit in space for db file?
> [...]
> Daniele,
> ~ You may find the recent threads "GCJ Native Proposal" and "Eclipse
> 3.0" informative. Unitl java-gcj-compat is a Debian package, there's
> not much we will do about it. I believe Michael Koch may be working on
> that.
>
> Regards,
> - --
> Barry Hawkins
> All Things Computed
> site: www.alltc.com
> weblog: www.yepthatsme.com
>
> Registered Linux User #368650
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFCOx8/7bZ6kUftWZwRAm9pAJ0QICBFdKzcccj2vMqXiOinDFYaRQCfQ7dG
> NO19ee1+dxG2w6TdXqm7amw=
> =YVfR
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: