Re: gcj4 changes : Please Comment
I mean as part of the arch-dep process. THe arch-dep process requires a
complete build, simply excluding everything else from the package.
Of course the jars are still required. They have things in them other
than .class files.
On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 08:49 +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 10:42:08PM -0500, Jerry Haltom wrote:
> > > I'm not in favour of compiling on the user machine. Also, don't forget
> > > if the package is well done, only the native part will be compiled, the
> > > jars are arch-indep so they'll not be re-compiled by the buildd's.
> >
> > How so?
> >
> > GCJ needs the .jar to compile the .so. That means the jars have to be
> > built, but they don't have to be packaged. Am I right?
>
> We have to package the jars. At least for all non-gcj-like runtimes which are
> all except gcj itself currently.
>
>
> Michael
> --
> Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath!
> http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html
>
> Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/
>
>
--
Jerry Haltom <wasabi@larvalstage.net>
Reply to: