Re: gcj4 changes : Please Comment
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 10:42:08PM -0500, Jerry Haltom wrote:
> > I'm not in favour of compiling on the user machine. Also, don't forget
> > if the package is well done, only the native part will be compiled, the
> > jars are arch-indep so they'll not be re-compiled by the buildd's.
>
> How so?
>
> GCJ needs the .jar to compile the .so. That means the jars have to be
> built, but they don't have to be packaged. Am I right?
We have to package the jars. At least for all non-gcj-like runtimes which are
all except gcj itself currently.
Michael
--
Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath!
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html
Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/
Reply to: