Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
I was wondering about that. Should I just close that bug and mark it "won't fix" or something? I mean, the fix won't go into stable anyway since it isn't security related, right? So why fix it?Is FTBFS a security bug? I don't think so? But kaffe is not in testing not because this bug tagged 'WOODY'! I don't think it's a problem.
Kaffe is currently marked remove and would not go into testing, but if 1.1.2 fixed both RC bugs, it could be accepted back, right? What is the procedure for that?I think if all the bugs from kaffe are resolved (by the 1.1.2 upload and some work on the man page), and if we wait for ten days (and got not more bugs), we can ask ftpmaster to put kaffe in testing with an explanation about the bug tagged 'woody' does not affect the current release.
I'm going to go ahead and upload 1.1.2. We'll see what it fixes. -- _____________________________________________________________________ Ean Schuessler ean@brainfood.com Chief Technology Officer 214-720-0700 x 315 Brainfood, Inc. http://www.brainfood.com