Re: JAVA_HOME and ant

[Jan Schulz <jasc.usenet@gmx.de>]

Hallo Dalibor,

Ok, I'm also good at philosophical nitpicking :)

* Dalibor Topic wrote:
>--- Jan Schulz <jasc.usenet@gmx.de> wrote:
>> > [...working ant...]How do you define normally?
>> Just as it is now.
>so the status quo, with ant having what we agreed upon to be some very badly
>designed code, barely working with free tols, is to be considered normal? 

If you tell me, that this code will change within this year, then I
will happily wait until that has happen. If not, I think that this
proposal could easily be addpated to a 'new reality', which would look
much like the bits about 'build.compiler'.

>> IMO, it isn't fit for main yet: the javadoc task won't work if kaffe
>> doesn't link a bin/javadoc into java.home. Thats at least how I read
>> the code. Stefan, have you tried that? 
>kaffe doesn't come with a real javadoc tool yet. I'll merge in gjdoc
>for kaffe 1.1.2.

Thanks for doing that!

Jan
-- 
Jan Schulz                     jasc@gmx.net
     "Wer nicht fragt, bleibt dumm."