Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath

To: debian-java@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath
From: Ben Burton <bab@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:52:13 +1000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030901095213.A19854@digican.ms.unimelb.edu.au>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030831171754.GB1951@katzien.de>; from jasc.usenet@gmx.de on Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 07:17:54PM +0200
References: <[🔎] 20030830212846.GA26350@katzien.de> <[🔎] 20030831134926.78192.qmail@web10008.mail.yahoo.com> <[🔎] 20030831171754.GB1951@katzien.de>

> Anyway, this gcj isn't in debian yet.

Hmm?  apt-cache show gcj

Or are you talking about a different version of gcj?  Or am I
misunderstanding your comment completely?

Ben.

Reply to:

References:
- Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath
  - From: Jan Schulz <default@katzien.de>
- Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath
  - From: Dalibor Topic <robilad@yahoo.com>
- Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath
  - From: Jan Schulz <jasc.usenet@gmx.de>

Prev by Date: http_proxy environment variable
Previous by thread: Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath
Next by thread: Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread