[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Eclipse on Debian unstable hangs



Hi,

  try RC2 and reopen below mentioned bug report if the problem still
exists...

      http://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31525

Cheers,
Mariano

> This is happening for me all the time, resizing eclipse window seem to
> work. I
> usually have to make it really small. Seems to start working about when
> 'package
> explorer''s treeview gets hidden.
> 
> Michael Rohleder <mike@rohleder.de>:
> > On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 04:08:59AM +0100, Michel Marti wrote:
> > > After using the Eclipse IDE for a while, the GUI components stop
> > > reacting on keyboard and mouse events and the CPU usage goes up to
> > > 100%. "top" shows that the cpu is eaten by java AND the X process.
> > > (about 50:50). I tried out eclipse 2.0.2 and also 2.1-RC1 (SWT
> > > version) and both versions show this problem. I also replaced
> > > the JDK (Sun 1.4.1) to 1.3.1 both this didn't help either.
> > > Using strace on the java process, it shows that java writes constantly
> > > writes on a unix socket (fd #8) and then tries to read from it, but
> > > read always returns EAGAIN.
> > > 
> > > Any hints?
> > 
> > I also have seen this several times.
> > Imho this has to do with the gtk widgets, because eclipse itself seems
> > to work, but nothing happens on the widgets, no redraw etc...
> > 
> > I tried the motif version and I had no hang in daily use after that.
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > mike@rohleder.de - http://www.rohleder.de/ - mroh@IRCNet - #8207142@ICQ
> > 1024D/142959D3 E8A6 9142 4171 D7A0 FA51  75EA F38D AD5C 1429 59D3
> > 
> > CChheecckk yyoouurr dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh..
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-request@lists.debian.org
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> > listmaster@lists.debian.org
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 

-- 
  



Reply to: