Re: [FW] Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.1-5.1 (i386 source)
Can't verify kaffe, but I agree that the "java2-runtime"
dependency is rather pointless.
I need one version of JDK (compiled with gcc 3.2) for
mozilla and the official sun binaries for eclipse. And as
much of a mess as that is it's still more to sort out the
dependencies.
roll on the debian java packages compiled with gcj.
c
On Tuesday 16 December 2003 9:01 am, Jan Schulz wrote:
> Hallo Ean,
>
> * Ean Schuessler wrote:
> >I certainly thought so. I'm ready to put a 1.1.3 release
> > in shortly. I've corrected that stupid manpath problem
> > in my rules file. I'll look over the NMU. Were uploads
> > broken for a while?
>
> Can someone certify, that this kaffe version is able to
> run eclipse 2.1.x?
>
> I'm having lots of problems with the Blackdown debian
> packages (segfaults in libc in JDK code) and I'm thinking
> of removing the 'java2-runtime' Dependency and explictly
> depending on the running JDKs (created by mpkg-j2sdk and
> j2se-package and, in this case, kaffe). That would be
> complient with the proposed java policy, but not the
> current one.
>
> BTW: is anyone still interested in this Proposal?
> Sometime ago I asked Stephan to include it in java-common
> (the tools), but I got no response. Should I package a
> seperate package and ask for a sponsor for it, so that I
> can start to send some patches?
>
> Jan
> --
> Jan Schulz jasc@gmx.net
> "Wer nicht fragt, bleibt dumm."
Reply to: