Any news about that?
Any objection if I adopt libxt-java?
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
: :' : Arnaud Vandyck
`. `' http://alioth.debian.org/users/arnaud-guest/
`- http://alioth.debian.org/developer/diary.php?diary_user=2781
jabber: avdyk@jabber.org
--- Begin Message ---
- To: debian-java@lists.debian.org
- Subject: status of libxt-java
- From: Arnaud Vandyck <arnaud-guest@users.alioth.debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 17:58:14 +0200 (CEST)
- Message-id: <20030807.175814.89642277.arnaud-guest@users.alioth.debian.org>
According to http://bugs.debian.org/200457 libxt-java is adopted by Morgon Kanter <morgon@surgo.net>. Is he still interrested? http://bugs.debian.org/145444 pointed out a new upstream release (1 year ago) There is also a (trivial) RC bug on it: http://bugs.debian.org/201567 The libxt-java package depends on "libservlet2.2-java | libservlet2.3-java". However, both of these packages are in contrib, which is not allowed by policy. I don't know why an xslt lib needs libservlet ;) but I can have a look. But I also don't know why libxt-java depends on libxalan2-java! ;) Isn't libxt-java an xslt library? ;) It also depends on java-common instead of java?-runtime. Best regards, -- Arnaud Vandyck http://alioth.debian.org/users/arnaud-guest/ http://alioth.debian.org/developer/diary.php?diary_user=2781Attachment: pgpbYbDs3PTak.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
Attachment:
pgp4BCA7m5tKw.pgp
Description: PGP signature