Re: additions to java-policy
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 03:25:59PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Ben Burton <bab@debian.org> wrote:
> [...]
> > I certainly don't believe we should remove versioned JARs until we can
> > come up with a solution that addresses the API problem. The current
> > solution is like giving a C library an soname that is equal to the
> > application version. If we remove versioned JARs it's like abandoning
> > sonames altogether.
>
> I agree. Can we think about it and wait a better proposal before simply
> removing it?
Yes please. Treat this as an objection for the removal of the versioned
names.
Regards,
// Ola
> -- Arnaud Vandyck
> http://alioth.debian.org/users/arnaud-guest/
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ opal@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \
| opal@lysator.liu.se 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: