Re: Bug#163390: JNI Installation Directories (again)
Hi
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 07:03:28AM +1100, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> > Personally, I feel they're 'just libraries' and should be treated as
> > such, going into /usr/lib.
>
> My argument for /usr/lib/jni is that other programs aren't going to want to
> link with them, so it's better not to clutter up the default shared library
> paths.
And I assume that no changes have to be made in /etc/ld.so.conf (or similar)?
> It's the same reason C python modules are placed beneath /usr/lib/pythonX.Y -
> these are just libraries, but you only ever use them as python imports, so
> you avoid cluttering up /usr/lib.
>
> > To me the key is that we agree on a single place to put JNI libraries.
>
> Yep, that and to also have the JVMs support this single place by including it
> in the default java.library.path.
Is this possible?
Regards,
// Ola
> Ben.
>
> --
>
> Ben Burton
> benb@acm.org | bab@debian.org
> Public Key: finger bab@db.debian.org
>
> Why can't they have gay people in the army? Personally, I think they are
> just afraid of a thousand guys with M16s going, "Who'd you call a faggot?"
> - Jon Stewart
>
>
>
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ opal@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \
| opal@lysator.liu.se 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: