Re: libsax-java
- To: debian-java@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: libsax-java
- From: Stefan Gybas <gybas@trustsec.de>
- Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 13:45:57 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20021001114557.GC17842@avoive.trustsec.de>
- In-reply-to: <8765wngzke.fsf@rabbit.fire-swamp.net>
- References: <877kh8bx9f.fsf@elisya.cyboman.spc> <20020926.174248.119298782.arnaud.vandyck@ulg.ac.be> <873crwbv8x.fsf@elisya.cyboman.spc> <1033069205.18991.51.camel@archaeopteryx> <87adm4xdhw.fsf@andor.geens.internal> <20020927050112.795A4350E6@cbbrowne.com> <877kh79t2h.fsf@andor.geens.internal> <20020930052645.GA1220@chrystal.opal.dhs.org> <3D9817B4.9010903@trustsec.de> <8765wngzke.fsf@rabbit.fire-swamp.net>
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 10:25:05AM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> [Ant, Xalan2]
> Do these classes work with gjc/kaffe?
I've done some tests with Ant and at least the core classes (i.e.
the ones in ant.jar) worked fine. Most of the optional classes in
ant-optional.jar do not, so I was thinking about splitting the package
into ant for main and ant-optional in contrib.
More library packages could easily be moved to main if there was a free
usable javadoc replacement. Grzegorz Prokopski intended to package gjdoc
(see http://bugs.debian.org/156411) but it looks like the problems he had
with the FTP admins when he tried to upload sablevm changed his mind.
--
Stefan Gybas
Reply to: