[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: free ant | naming issues



On Sat, 2002-08-31 at 11:20, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> Mark Howard wrote:
> 
> > 1) Does anyone know of any apache ant clone in main. Or, is there any
> > chance of ant being moved to main in the near future. 
> 
> I don't know of any Ant clone bu I'm working on moving Ant (and some 
> other Java packages) to main. I'll split ant into ant in main and 
> ant-optional (which builds optional.jar and the docs) in contrib but for 
> this we need to clarify the possible license problems with Kaffe first 
> or get it to work with GIJ.
excellent, thanks. What are the main problems with making it work with
gij?

> > My proposed package names:
...
> This looks good to me, except that libgtk-0.8-java-doc should be named 
> libgtk0.8-java-doc for consistency.
of course. That was just a typo :)
-- 

+----------------------------------------------+
| Mark Howard               cam.ac.uk   mh344@ |
| http://www.tildemh.com    tildemh.com    mh@ |
+----------------------------------------------+

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: