Re: comments on proposed java policy
Jan Evert van Grootheest wrote:
2. why must java-compiler depend on java-runtime???? I propose to make
this a suggestion. For example, gcj isn't a java class.
I'm not sure what you mean by this statement - presumably that gcj isn't
a Java run-time. While the gcj *command* isn't a Java runtme, gcj comes
with an associated interpreter and runtime. The command 'gij' is
intended to be able to replace the 'java' command.
--
--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com http://www.bothner.com/per/
Reply to: