Re: The proposed java policy have now moved.
Hi Ola,
Great work, and thanks for updating the policy. :-)
Just one question though - I'm curious why programs have to depend on
both java-virtual-machine *and* java1/2-runtime now ? Why is this so ?
I would have thought depending on java1/2-runtime would implicitly
mean that the software requires a java-virtual-machine ?
Now that we have java1/2-runtime, what does java-virtual-machine
actually mean now ? (do we even need it anymore ?) does it mean 'any'
jvm ? (in which case depending on it and java1/2 would be slightly
contradictory wouldn't it ?)
Or have I missed the point entirely ? :-)
Cheers,
Marcus
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
>
> Hi
>
> As the new maintainer I have now finally had the time to
> change the policy acording to the discussions on the java
> mailinglist.
>
> Because the previous policy was on bortz accound I have to
> move it to a new location
> http://people.debian.org/~opal/java/policy.html
>
> So the link from www.debian.org/devel should be changed acordingly.
>
> Hints on how to make this page (automaticly, no manual changes each
> time please) look like the other official pages
> are appriciated. Bortz used docbook but I can not find out how
> he created the web version. So now I have the same html version
> as the one in java-common.
>
> Regards,
>
> // Ola
>
> PS: Folks on debian-java are welcome to read it though and make
> comments. :)
> DS.
>
>
--
.....
,,$$$$$$$$$, Marcus Crafter
;$' '$$$$: Computer Systems Engineer
$: $$$$: Open Software Associates GmbH
$ o_)$$$: 82-84 Mainzer Landstrasse
;$, _/\ &&:' 60327 Frankfurt Germany
' /( &&&
\_&&&&' Email : Marcus.Crafter@osa.de
&&&&. Business Hours : +49 69 9757 200
&&&&&&&:
Reply to: