Re: Bug#41113: Proposal: Naming Conventions for modules

[Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>]

Stefan Gybas wrote:
> I would also prefer such a scheme. What about colons in package names?
> I know that they are currently not allowed but is there a technical
> reason not to allow them? According to footnote 14 in the packaging
> manual, colons used to be legal. Was this changed when epochs were
> introduced?

Probably. It would rock if we could use the exact module name as the
package, I agree. :-)

-- 
see shy jo