Re: lenny rant
Hi:
>From the Apache web site:
Apache 1.3.41 Released 2008-01-19
The Apache Group is pleased to announce the legacy release of the
1.3.41 version of the Apache HTTP Server.
This version of Apache is principally a security release.
For further details, see the announcement.
So it does look to be actively maintained. But I think Apache2 is now
the recommended version, and Apache1 is only kept around for people
that refuse to upgrade :P
I think Apache2 is stable enough to be production-ready at this point,
at least the 2.0 stream. The active development is happening on Apache
2.2.
If the community finds Apache1 useful, then perhaps we should continue
to package it. I however cannot volunteer to do so, since I really
wouldn't know where to start :-)
Hope this helps,
Jonathan
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Raquel <raquel@thericehouse.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 13:29:09 +0100
> Michael Moritz <mimo@gn.apc.org> wrote:
>
>> arrh I just had a look through the packages in lenny and realised
>> somehow apache 1 is not there. What the heck are these people
>> thinking? Is it really such a pain to maintain apache 1? Looking at
>> this web subsection (http://packages.debian.org/stable/web/) I see
>> all sorts of obscure packages that probably have about 2 users
>> each. Is there any way to lobby to bring back apache 1 (and
>> actually I also miss apache-ssl) or should I just shut up and start
>> planning on upgrading to bloody apache 2?
>>
>> mimo
>>
>
> Begin upgrading to Apache2. I'm not even sure that Apache 1.3 is
> being maintained upstream.
>
> --
> Raquel
> http://www.byraquel.com
> ============================================================
> I've done more harm by the falseness of trying to please than by the
> honesty of trying to hurt.
>
> --Jessamyn West
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-isp-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
Reply to: