Re: SAN solution wanted
> On Jun 11, Christian Kujau illuminated :
> But I should have emphasized the *small* in "small network" (hello,
> H??ctor!). My current favourites are WDG2T20000[0], which comes with 2TB
> (minimum of storage I'd like to have) and Firewire, which hopefully will
> work with the Mac Mini I'd like to attach.
>
Ah. when I think of SAN, I start thinking from $20,000.
ISP list and all.
> Hm, FC is no good for me, I think, I'd like to get this done with
> Firewire, USB as a second choice, but I heard FW is more stable for
> storage paths.
>
Firewire has always been my link of choice for running data over. USB
has too high a CPU usage.
There are some Mac oriented storage devices (names escape me at the
moment). They're more likely to have sane firewire ports.
./jp
--
Jean-Paul Blaquiere
jeanpaul@blaquiere.id.au
http://www.blaquiere.id.au
http://japester.ucc.asn.au/
Reply to: