RE: conntrack_max
# /proc/sys/net/ipv4/netfilter#ls
ip_conntrack_buckets ip_conntrack_tcp_loose
ip_conntrack_tcp_timeout_max_retrans
ip_conntrack_count ip_conntrack_tcp_max_retrans
ip_conntrack_tcp_timeout_syn_recv
ip_conntrack_generic_timeout ip_conntrack_tcp_timeout_close
ip_conntrack_tcp_timeout_syn_sent
ip_conntrack_icmp_timeout ip_conntrack_tcp_timeout_close_wait
ip_conntrack_tcp_timeout_time_wait
ip_conntrack_log_invalid ip_conntrack_tcp_timeout_established
ip_conntrack_udp_timeout
ip_conntrack_max ip_conntrack_tcp_timeout_fin_wait
ip_conntrack_udp_timeout_stream
ip_conntrack_tcp_be_liberal ip_conntrack_tcp_timeout_last_ack
# lsmod |grep conntra
ip_conntrack_pptp 10384 1 ip_nat_pptp
ip_conntrack_tftp 4344 1 ip_nat_tftp
ip_conntrack_irc 6896 1 ip_nat_irc
ip_conntrack_ftp 7536 1 ip_nat_ftp
ip_conntrack 47024 11
# -----Mensaje original-----
# De: ann kok [mailto:annkok2001@yahoo.com]
# Enviado el: Miércoles, 10 de Octubre de 2007 01:14 p.m.
# Para: Seth Mattinen; debian-isp@lists.debian.org
# Asunto: Re: conntrack_max
#
# i try
#
# find /proc -name ip_conntrack_max
#
# but nothing!
#
# --- Seth Mattinen <sethm@rollernet.us> wrote:
#
# > ann kok wrote:
# > > Sorry. i can't get this file under this folder
# > >
# > > I am running debian 2.4.27-2-386 #1 Wed Aug 17
# > > 09:33:35 UTC 2005 i686 GNU/Linux
# > >
# > > and ls 80000 enough? I am running 4G memory
# > >
# > > thank you
# > >
# >
# > It's probably under /proc/sys/net or something. Go
# > look it up for the
# > actual location.
# >
# > ~Seth
# >
# >
# > --
# > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
# > debian-isp-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
# > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
# > listmaster@lists.debian.org
# >
# >
#
#
#
#
# __________________________________________________________________________
# __________
# Check out the hottest 2008 models today at Yahoo! Autos.
# http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html
#
#
# --
# To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-isp-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
# with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
# listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: