On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 10:01:16AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 07:13:15PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 09:05:01AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 05:03:54AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 06:25:01PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote: > > > > > changing something that will break things for the majority in order > > > > > to cater for a miniscule minority (embedded systems developers) is a > > > > > ludicrous proposition. it makes no sense at all. > > > > > > > > > So, you would be in favor not improving the compilers or fixing compiler > > > > bugs? > > > > > > thanks for the stupid straw-man argument. it highlights the irrational > > > thinking behind the proposal to replace bash with dash. > > > > > Actually, my statement is a natural extension of yours. > > no, it's a *stupid* extension of mine, not a "natural" extension. > > it's what is known as "grasping at straws". indicating irrationality and > desperation. your argument holds no water, and you know it - hence the > descent into absurd projection. > Clearly, your argument also holds no water. Else, why would you conveniently ignore the explanation that I gave following that? Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature