Re: network analyzer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Michael Loftis wrote:
> I can't recommend ntop. It's really buggy and really really resource
> intensive. Besides what he seems to be talking about is active service
> checks, not network monitoring. So the original poster needs to
> straighten out what they actually want. Network Analysis or network
> monitoring or host/service monitoring. Three VERY different things.
>
> --On February 15, 2007 12:13:28 AM +0100 Gilles Mocellin
> <gilles.mocellin@free.fr> wrote:
>
>> Le mercredi 14 février 2007 15:28, Chris Parker a écrit :
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I am looking for recommendations for a network analyzer for a 1200 pc,
>>> multiple switches and routers, size network.
>>>
>>> Nagios groundworks opensource looks promising. Mapping and showing
>>> possible problems looks good.
>>>
>>> Google searches bring back alot of choices, but I would like real world
>>> experience advice from my fellow Debian users.
>>
>> No one speaks about ntop !
>> You have also fprobe + flowscan.
>
>
>
> --
> Michael Loftis
> Modwest Operations Manager
> Powerful, Affordable Web Hosting
>
>
OK I will rephrase my question. I combined the two together. Sorry
about that. First off I would like to know what the list would
recommend for network flow. Showing bottlenecks, src and dst of
packets. I have used ntop, and was curious what else was out there.
The other question was geared toward system monitoring. Nagios looks
promising. I was wondering what others were using, and what would be
recommended.
thanks for the responses
Chris
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFF06ZCfnAfmpxxbc4RAoIOAJwOXd5QZ4zGlGJdh8wPLLjlsvfTZgCfVL4W
2HBbB/mH4zG7k1LoOE48e9o=
=ailM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: