This one time, at band camp, Matus UHLAR - fantomas said: > On 05.11.07 23:02, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > spamassassin 3.2.3-0.volatile1 is currently available in > > etch-proposed/volatile. Before we accept it to etch/volatile i would > > like to ask some experienced SysAdmins to do some (more extended testing > > as we did) of the package and report back any problems you find to > > debian-volatile@lists.debian.org. > > > > As soon as we are convinced that SA 3.2.3 works as expected i will > > move the package to etch/volatile and send an official announcement. > > is there any plan to push that into sarge volatile? Not from my point of view. The versioned dependency tree is just too large for me to feel comfortable that it won't break other things on sarge. I'm not thrilled (I still have a sarge machine that does some mail), but I think it's the right move from the perspective of the volatile archive and it's impact on main. That's not to say some interested person couldn't do an upload to backports.org or something where the rules are a little laxer. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : sgran@debian.org | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature