Re: Password file with over 3000 users.
Am Sunday, den 23 September hub Matus UHLAR - fantomas folgendes in die Tasten:
> > On Sep 21, 2007, at 5:12 PM, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > >This is only true if the shebang is /bin/sh - you are of course
> > >free to
> > >write maintainer scripts with /bin/bash as the shebang, just as your
> > >free to write perl scripts for your maintainer scripts. That being
> > >said, there is a push for dash to replace bash as the dfeault
> > >non-interactive shell for lenny.
> On 22.09.07 07:06, Nate Duehr wrote:
> > Why? Just to be annoyingly different from every other distro
> > (again)? Or is there a very compelling technical reason?
> I don't think it's annoying. I feel annoyed bu many distros expecting
> /bin/sh to be bash, bringing up meny incompatibilities with FreeBSD and
So bash cannot do things FreeBSD or Solaris sh can?
> I'm for complete replacing of bash with dash, making dash essential
> (and bash not essential) and I've used dash (and ash, which was its previous
> name) since I've found it in debian distribution...
> I think that bash is bloatware.
Now *you* would break compability.
Sure, it's the problem of the user who wrote a script which uses
bashism and uses /bin/sh as shebang, but *you* would make it break.
What about using "#!/usr/bin/env sh" for all script which have to be
Follow the white penguin.