Re: Webserver Redundacy

To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Webserver Redundacy
From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 06:15:42 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 45E6B5DE.5010705@meetinghouse.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 45E69181.2090102@goirand.fr>
References: <20070227224457.GA26375@santiago.connexer.com> <20070227225130.AFC473BA7F@jdcomputers.com.au> <20070227230941.GB28536@taz.net.au> <1172618839.18616.3.camel@localhost> <20070228001620.GC28536@taz.net.au> <20070228003406.GD28536@taz.net.au> <45E5B400.4090508@besy.co.uk> <20070228211259.GD9437@taz.net.au> <[🔎] 45E69181.2090102@goirand.fr>

Something just occurred to me:

After wading through all the discussions of advertising multiple IPs viaDNS vs. using a heartbeat mechanism vs. using LVM, it strikes me thatApache has to be appropriately configured as well.

If one is using "Listen" commands in your Apache config. file, I don'tyou can simply tell set your backup (or redundant) daemon to listen onaddresses that aren't currently active. Won't Apache complain atstartup about "can't bind to address?"


Miles

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Webserver Redundacy
  - From: Joe Emenaker <joe@emenaker.com>
- Re: Webserver Redundacy
  - From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>

References:
- Re: Webserver Redundacy
  - From: Thomas Goirand <thomas@goirand.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: Veritas Remote Unix Agent
Next by Date: Re: Webserver Redundacy
Previous by thread: Re: Webserver Redundacy
Next by thread: Re: Webserver Redundacy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread