LDAP for virtual domains and relaying (WAS: postfix + dspam + mysql)
> >On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 04:22:21PM -0600, David Bishop wrote:
> >>5) mysql as the database to hold the aliases, uids, usernames, and
> >>passwords (of course?). We're looking for this to scale, and nothing
> >>says scalability and 'enterpriseness' like throwing stuff in a database.
> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> >I know that I have been "flamed" in the past for my insistence that
> >people stay away from MySQL. So, here I go again: please don't use
> >MySQL. I know that they have gotten better of late, but their new
> >features are just that: new. There are superior free choices of
> >databases out there. I know some folks prefer Firebird, though I cannot
> >say anything about it one way or the other as I am not familiar with it.
> >However, I would highly recommend PostgreSQL. Escpecially if you are
> >looking for great scalability, I believe PostrgeSQL is the best you can
> >get without shelling out $$$$ for DB2 or Oracle.
On 12.10.06 15:41, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> I'll just chime in here really quick - I use MySQL because it had native
> replication.
While talking about it, LDAP has native replication too, support failover
and many mailers support it natively.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
I wonder how much deeper the ocean would be without sponges.
Reply to: