mon vs nagios

To: debian-isp <debian-isp@lists.debian.org>
Subject: mon vs nagios
From: "Christian Lyra" <lyra@pop-pr.rnp.br>
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2006 12:47:48 -0300
Message-id: <[🔎] ff07fffe0606040847s6ea159f2q310d4606082beaf0@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <ff07fffe0606040826h118a450by86e4969164a93742@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 4482F661.4070703@thecsl.org> <[🔎] 4482F9B9.8000802@midnighthax.com> <ff07fffe0606040826h118a450by86e4969164a93742@mail.gmail.com>

my bad... just realized that I replied to one of the members and not to the list.

Hi,

I did the other path, switch from nagios to mon, after discover that althought nagios has a nice web interface it has serious problems with parallization checks/alerts. Write checks/alerts to mon is very easy (I wrote a few ones). Shouldn't be too difficult to update the AIM alert.

On 6/4/06, Keith Edmunds < keith@midnighthax.com> wrote:

> What are other people's experiences with mon?

We switched to Nagios a few years ago, and have never looked back. Yes,
it requires some time investment to start with, but IMO it's worth it.

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-isp-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- mon vs nagios
  - From: Dan MacNeil <dan@thecsl.org>
- Re: mon vs nagios
  - From: Keith Edmunds <keith@midnighthax.com>

Prev by Date: Re: mon vs nagios
Next by Date: Re: mon vs nagios
Previous by thread: Re: mon vs nagios
Next by thread: Re: mon vs nagios
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread