also sprach Mark Ferlatte <ferlatte@cryptio.net> [2004.11.07.1013 +0100]: > Don't know about most; I use Postfix. I don't think exim is a bad choice, > though; I just liked Postfix better, and it performs well enough to meet my > needs. Well said. also sprach Brett Parker <iDunno@sommitrealweird.co.uk> [2004.11.07.1226 +0100]: > exim4 and postfix, depending on the machine, and who origionally set it > up. New machines are getting exim4 because it is far more flexible and > powerful that postfix (in my experience). Well, my last tests have shown postfix to be more performant by about a factor of 1.6. In addition, there is the single setuid binary thing about exim. You are right that exim has a lot more features than postfix. However, are they needed? To me, exim tries to be more than an MTA, which is why I surely prefer postfix. I can't wait until I have time to try/use/improve Md's policy framework. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature