[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: understanding Routing Cisco vs. Linux



also sprach Thedore Knab <tjk@annapolislinux.org> [2002.09.26.1508 +0200]:
> ip route 209.243.33.0 255.255.255.0 FastEthernet0/0
> ip route 209.243.34.0 255.255.255.0 FastEthernet0/0
> ip route 209.243.35.0 255.255.255.0 FastEthernet0/0
> ip route 209.243.36.0 255.255.255.0 FastEthernet0/0
> ip route 209.243.37.0 255.255.255.0 FastEthernet0/0
> ip route 209.243.38.0 255.255.255.0 FastEthernet0/0
> ip route 209.243.39.0 255.255.255.0 FastEthernet0/0
> ip route 209.243.40.0 255.255.255.0 FastEthernet0/0
> ip route 209.243.41.0 255.255.255.0 FastEthernet0/0
> ip route 209.243.42.0 255.255.255.0 FastEthernet0/0
> ip route 209.243.43.0 255.255.255.0 FastEthernet0/0
> ip route 209.243.44.0 255.255.255.0 FastEthernet0/0
> ip route 209.243.45.0 255.255.255.0 FastEthernet0/0
> ip route 209.243.46.0 255.255.255.0 FastEthernet0/0
> ip route 209.243.47.0 255.255.255.0 FastEthernet0/0

ip route 209.243.32.0 255.255.255.0 <where things go if not FastEthernet0/0>
ip route 209.243.32.0 255.255.240.0 FastEthernet0/0

does the same, and faster.

-- 
martin;              (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
  \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; net@madduck
 
unix, because rebooting is for adding new hardware.

Attachment: pgpJK7dmOhqva.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: