Re: eth0: Memory squeeze, deferring packet
On Sun, 7 Oct 2001 06:13, Jason Lim wrote:
> Well... I doubt the it is (1) because the system was NOT under great load,
> and doesn't have software RAID, and only uses one 100baseT realtek card.
>
> SO... i guess it is (2). Kernel is 2.2.19... i thought it would be pretty
> much stable by now?! damn.
>
> how is kernel 2.4.x now? Do you think they are safe enough for production
> use? Any huge performance increase?
2.4.x is working well on my servers. It is supposedly faster at IP routing
and certain types of disk IO. My tests show better raw ide performance but I
never seriously compared file system speed.
--
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/projects.html Projects I am working on
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
Reply to: