[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Have you been hacked by f*ck PoizonBOx?



On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Jesse Goerz wrote:

> This guy spammed debian-isp, debian-mentor, debian-sgml, and debian-doc that
> I know of.  Does anyone know how to report this guy to his isp?  I'm not
> using a "real" email program and I don't know what I'm looking for in the
> mail headers. (or is he using an open relay?)

...
Received: (qmail 6730 invoked by uid 38); 1 Jun 2001 16:42:17 -0000
X-Envelope-Sender: jimbobuk@home.com
Received: (qmail 6503 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2001 16:42:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO wgs.steeple.plc.uk) (195.188.28.11)
  by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 1 Jun 2001 16:42:09 -0000
Received: from intellistation ([195.188.28.55]) by wgs.steeple.plc.uk
with
    Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.1600);
         Fri, 1 Jun 2001 17:33:59 +0100
Received: from intellistation [127.0.0.1]
        by intellistation
        with SMTPBeamer v3.24a ;
        Fri, 1 Jun 2001 12:51:44 +0100
From: "L@@K dont throw away!" <jimbobuk@home.com>
To: <debian-isp@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Have you been hacked by f*ck PoizonBOx?
Sender: "L@@K dont throw away!" <jimbobuk@home.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 12:51:42 +0100
X-Priority: 1 (Highest)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Old-Return-Path: jimbobuk@home.com
Message-ID: <WGSCorX9B0kY8fNp0Va00003a54@wgs.steeple.plc.uk>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jun 2001 16:33:59.0437 (UTC)
    FILETIME=[A8DDE3D0:01C0EAB8]
Resent-Message-ID: <rIWHr.A.4oB.pX8F7@murphy>
Resent-From: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: <debian-isp@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/6475
X-Loop: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: debian-isp-request@lists.debian.org
...

-- 
Martin Wheeler       -        StarTEXT - Glastonbury - BA6 9PH - England
[1] mwheeler@startext.co.uk                   http://www.startext.co.uk/

     - Share your knowledge. It's one way to achieve immortality. -





Reply to: