Re: Maildir vs mbox

To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Maildir vs mbox
From: JPS <jpstewart@carbonmedia.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 10:29:18 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010516102918.B24167@carbonmedia.com>
Mail-followup-to: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] lnzoce9qqf.fsf@sol.starnix.com>; from fraser@starnix.com on Tue, May 15, 2001 at 06:44:56PM -0400
References: <[🔎] lnae4ehc6j.fsf_-_@sol.starnix.com> <[🔎] 20010515122255.B14149@carbonmedia.com> <[🔎] lnzoce9qqf.fsf@sol.starnix.com>

On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 06:44:56PM -0400, Fraser Campbell wrote:
> 
> > Understandable. Sounds like a case for maildir...(and courier-imap if you can handle
> > a sealed server).
> 
> Are you saying this because of the insecurity of the IMAP protocol
> (plain-text authentication and transfers) or because you feel there are
> particular vulnerabilities in courier-imap?
I confused courier with cyrus. Sorry for the confusion.
-- 
Jean-Paul Stewart
Senior Systems Administrator

CarbonMedia, Inc.
114 East 25th Street, Eighth Floor
New York, NY 10010
Phone: 212.253.7180
Fax: 212.253.8467

http://www.carbonmedia.com/

Reply to:

References:
- Maildir vs mbox
  - From: Fraser Campbell <fraser@starnix.com>
- Re: Maildir vs mbox
  - From: JPS <jpstewart@carbonmedia.com>
- Re: Maildir vs mbox
  - From: Fraser Campbell <fraser@starnix.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Cyrus or Courier?
Next by Date: courier,cyrus,imap
Previous by thread: Re: Maildir vs mbox
Next by thread: Re: Maildir vs mbox
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread