Re: w/c RAID on a SQL box
RAID 5. Easy to set up, fast, and reliable. Uses more disks, however.
RAID 1 is, I believe, mirroring. With that, all info must be written to
two different disks. With RAID 5, the disks are "striped" (not really,
but I don't remember the real name for it) and part of each byte, with a
checksum, goes on each disk. So, your disk writes are actually being
written to multiple disks, so they are faster (in theory). And, if one
disk fails, you can recover because the failed disk can be rebuilt fro
the others.
Rod
> hello,
>
> my hosting company told me that they only support either RAID 1 and
RAID 5.
>
> so given this choice, w/c would you suggest?
> i use a MySQL database for a bulletin board application w/c does
_LOTS_ of
> SELECTS and data lookup.
>
> thanks in advance,
> chad
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Calendar - Get organized for the holidays!
> http://calendar.yahoo.com/
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-isp-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
R. W. Rodolico
Daily Data, Inc.
POB 140465
Dallas TX 75214-0465
214.827.2170
It appears I could be pursuing an untamed ornithoid to no purpose.
--Brent Spiner as Data, Star Trek: The Next Generation
Reply to: