It's a pain in the ass to maintain an ability to track users sending spam
from your dialups and through your server if you don't have each user
authenticate and the connections all apear to hit the mail server from the
That's what vetoed ours for a long time.
Then we just got a few more class C's ;) NAT is a pluss for security, a
minus for latency and a minus for accountability for who does what outside
On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Kevin wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone can tell me sort of problems I would have
> if I assigned internal ips to our customers and used ipmasq.
> Basically I don't want to do this, but I need some sort of firepower
> to persuade my boss that he doesn't want it either. Any
> info/link/short coming of age stories would be greatly appreciated.
- Re: nat
- From: Russell Coker <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- From: Kevin <email@example.com>