[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: auto6to4



On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 01:40:18PM +0200, Jens Link wrote:
> 6to4? The soon to be deprecated protocol? I don't think that it makes
> much sense to use it or provide a package. See
> 
> https://labs.ripe.net/Members/emileaben/6to4-how-bad-is-it-really 
> 
> for details. 
> 
> 6in4 provide e.g. by tunnelbroker.net or sixxs is a much better
> solution (if your provider doesn't offer native IPv6).
I call it broken too:
http://img2.ipv6-test.com/speedtest/result/2012/06/06/1f36f5e19f7de3410a31971e127f373e.png
Well, 192.88.99.1 is not available here at all but I suspect that if my
ISP provided it, the speed would be much more acceptable.

-- 
WBR, wRAR

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: