Hi, On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 03:03:56PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Hello Florian Lohoff, > > Am 2012-09-08 13:30:39, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: > > NAT64 breaks to much stuff - My humble guess working for ISPs and > > dealing with IPv6 introduction is that we will see DualStack "forever" > > with RFC1918 adresses and NAT44 ... > > I consider already to give Static IPv6 adresses to my customers (free.fr > and alice-dsl.de do the same) which should solv some problems... > > What do you think about? I'd like to see that happening - The Internet or IP was always thought as a peer to peer or "any to any" communication protocol. With NAT and Dynamic IP Addresses breaking this principle. There was no server and no client definition in the original thoughts of IP. > I have more IPv6 addresses, as I need to provide Baden-Wuertemberg > internet access and take over Google. :-D My guess is that our "Privacy" people will prohibit static prefixes for subscribers. Most people havent heard about privacy extensions and the size of prefixes e.g. /56 where to hide a single workstation. Tracking subscribers or users by cookies is much simpler than by IP Address. Flo -- Florian Lohoff f@zz.de
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature