Hi all, On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 01:49:27PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote: > Jason White <jason@jasonjgw.net> writes: > > A further consideration is whether Wide DHCpv6 is maintained upstream - it > > appears not to be. > > That's my impression as well. There doesn't seem to be any activity at > all from the upstream maintainer(s). > > The Debian maintainer is doing a great job, but the main problem with > Wide DHCPv6 is the lack of an upstream. Kind of begs for someone to > just take it... Just for the record, wide-dhcpv6 upstream has not been responsive at all for the last couple of years. I would have taken the project over if I had time to do so. Feel free to submit patches to the Debian BTS. I will gladly integrate them in the Debian package and also forward them upstream, just in case. Also, if anyone is willing to help on the Debian packaging, I am open to any proposal. I have little time to work on this right now. It would definitely benefit from more people getting involved. It is hosted on one of my own servers but I would probably move that to git.debian.org if someone stepped up. Cheers, -- Jeremie /* Patient: Doctor, it hurts when I do this! Doctor: Well, then don't do it. */
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature