[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Ipv6 DNS and ipv4 host - Tranistion problem



On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 14:57 +0200, Simon Oosthoek wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 10:35:32AM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 23:54 +0200, Simon Oosthoek wrote:
> > 
> > > I'm working on a research project where subnetting might actually be very
> > > much appliccable, for example when you are using NEMO and you have several
> > > mobile routers (each with its own /64 or bigger subnet), and you still want
> > > to keep part of your entire prefix to be subnettable outside of the HA's
> > > realm, then you may feel a little bit cramped by a /56.
> > 
> > Mobility is usually done per host, thus you route the /128 over a tunnel
> > to somewhere else and do ND proxying. One doesn't need loads of addres
> > space for this. But this depends on the design of course.
> 
> in NEMO mobility (actually, that's superfluous, NEtwork MObility is what
> NEMO stands for) is done per subnet or prefix, thus enabling mobility for a
> mobile network.

Depending on how large a network is, but in most cases I'd guess it will
be only a /64, thus a subnet, which one can take out of an already
existing /48, or the /56.

NEMO things are also sort of close to shim6 stuff, at least the wording
of what it is supposed to be doing.

Greets,
 Jeroen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: