According to all accounts a consensus was reached at the SF IETF ipng WG meeting and follow-up vote on the mailing list... Although a small group have not agreed with it and has had an AD appeal regarding it which is holding up any movement on the subject by the WG even though the AD response was that the WG chairs had done everything correctly... The AD response to the Site-Local appeal was posted back on Jul 9th by Thomas Narten... As I work as an IPv6 network admin my department is actively following both the v6ops and ipng WG mailing lists... Site-Local has been quite a thorn in the backside and a rather hot topic on the MLs... Regards, Jeremy On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:41:56PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 06:14:32AM -0700, > Jeremy T. Bouse <jbouse@debian.org> wrote > a message of 52 lines which said: > > > I wouldn't bother to spend too much time trying to deal with > > site-local addressing as it has been deprecated by the IETF IPv6 WG... > > Wrongly, IMHO, and after a lot of controversy. And I'm not sure (it is > often difficult to synthetize work-in-progress of the IETF) there is a > consensus yet. > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ipv6-request@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org >
Attachment:
pgphxbMwWwehN.pgp
Description: PGP signature