Re: IPv6 packages
Previously Remco van de Meent wrote:
> Why create yet another chicken/egg problem? Introducing new delay now
> causes even worse problems in the future.
Do a lookup in both now..
> ip6.arpa is what the IAB wants so I'd say we should follow.
As far as I know nobody is using ip6.arpa. Everyone I know is still
using ip6.int, and ip6.arpa delegations for ranges that RIPE assigns
are not even made.
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/wichert@wiggy.net This space intentionally left occupied \
| wichert@deephackmode.org http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Reply to: