Re: IPv6 packages
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Remco van de Meent wrote:
> > Why create yet another chicken/egg problem? Introducing new delay now
> > causes even worse problems in the future.
>
> Do a lookup in both now..
Helps the user at this moment, but doesn't lead to the necessary
momentum necessary for a change from ip6.int to ip6.arpa.
> > ip6.arpa is what the IAB wants so I'd say we should follow.
>
> As far as I know nobody is using ip6.arpa. Everyone I know is still
> using ip6.int, and ip6.arpa delegations for ranges that RIPE assigns
> are not even made.
Correct.
I guess RIPE is the chicken and the ranges are eggs. No pun intended :p
regards,
Remco.
--
:: remco@vandemeent.net
:: http://remco.vandemeent.net/
Reply to: