Re: Annoying routing troubles (fwd)
The mail doesn't seem to have gotten through in past 3 days, so I'm
resending this. My apologies if there's a duplicate.
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Craig Small wrote:
> Pontus Lidman said:
> > I have three hosts; one gateway to the 6bone, and two clients.
> > client A can ping client B, the gateway, and 6bone hosts.
> > client B can ping client A, but not the gateway and no 6bone hosts. The
> > error is "address unreachable".
> Who's saying unreachable?
The misbehaving client B says unreachable.
> > Here is the routing table for client A:
> > 3ffe:200:13::2/128 3ffe:200:13::2 UC 0 2 1 eth0
> I think the C means a cache entry, whatever the hell that is
>
> > And the routing table for the misbehaving client B:
> > 3ffe:200:13::2/128 3ffe:200:13::2 UC 1 1 0 eth0
> OK, different metric.
> > ::/0 :: UDA 256 0 0 eth0
> Hmm D? You got some sort of routing daemon on this host?
Nope. I do run radvd on the gateway though.
> You probably want to compare /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all between them
They are identical :(
Also, pinging client B from the gateway, doesn't give "address
unreachable", just 100% packet loss.
I'm stuck :(
--
Pontus Lidman, pontus@mathcore.com, Software Engineer
No matter how cynical you get, it's impossible to keep up.
Scene: www.dc-s.com | MUD: tyme.envy.com 6969 | irc: irc.quakenet.eu.org
Reply to: