[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Interix package error

On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Denis Raguzov wrote:

Good day, Martin!
I try to install http://debian-interix.net/ on SUA, but get following error:

sh-3.1$ apt-get  update
Get:1 http://debian-interix.net unstable52 Release.gpg
Get:2 http://debian-interix.net unstable35 Release.gpg
Ign http://debian-interix.net unreleased52 Release.gpg
Ign http://debian-interix.net unreleased35 Release.gpg
Get:3 http://ftp.de.debian.org unstable Release.gpg [197B]
Ign http://ftp.de.debian.org dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/ Release.gpg
Get:4 http://debian-interix.net unstable52 Release [79B]
Get:5 http://debian-interix.net unstable35 Release [320B]
Get:6 http://debian-interix.net unreleased52 Release [65B]
Get:7 http://ftp.de.debian.org unstable Release [85.1kB]
Ign http://debian-interix.net unstable52 Release
Ign http://debian-interix.net unstable35 Release
Get:8 http://debian-interix.net unreleased35 Release [963B]
Get:9 http://debian-interix.net unreleased52/main Packages [20B]
Get:10 http://debian-interix.net unreleased52/main Sources [20B]
Get:11 http://debian-interix.net unstable52/main Packages [20B]
Get:12 http://debian-interix.net unstable35/main Packages [407kB]
Get:13 http://ftp.de.debian.org dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/ Release
Get:14 http://ftp.de.debian.org unstable/main Sources [3603kB]
Get:15 http://debian-interix.net unreleased35/main Packages [142kB]
Get:16 http://debian-interix.net unreleased35/main Sources [38.0kB]
Get:17 http://ftp.de.debian.org dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/ Packages
Fetched 11.9MB in 55s (212kB/s)
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: http://debian-interix.net unstable52 Release: The following
signatures were invalid: NODATA 2
W: GPG error: http://debian-interix.net unstable35 Release: The following
signatures were invalid: NODATA 2
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems

"apt-get -f update" fail too.

This is no error. Everything looks fine. "W:" is warning, because there are no signed packages yet.


Reply to: